This 3-step editing trick elevates any sentence

Even some stinkers from my uni dissertation šŸ‘€

In partnership with

Take the next step in your freelance business

MOFU Mastery gives freelancer content folks the tools, resources, and support they need to grow today – and stay ahead tomorrow.

Join MOFU today to get the full catalog of MOFU resources, including:

  • Six-Figure Strategist

  • Break/through Bylines

  • The 360° Content Refresh Workflow

  • Advanced Keyword Research

  • The 5-Minute Proposal System

  • Agency & Freelancer Positioning 

Plus, get access to weekly co-working sessions and a private peer network…

All for just $49/month šŸ‘€

Sometimes I’m editing my writing and hit a sentence that’s harder to get through than a mouthful of peanut butter.

So I spend aaaagggggeeeessss banging my head against the keyboard tryna make it pop…

And still end up with a sentence you need snowshoes to wade through.

That was my life until I stumbled on a simple three-step editing process from Henneke Duistermaat that finally helped me zhuzh up clunky sentences – fast.

So today, I thought I’d share Henneke’s process – and show you how it works on some absolutely honking sentences…

From my uni dissertation 😱

Let’s go!

Okay, Henneke’s process is almost boringly simple…

But trust me – it works!

Try these three steps with any sentence you’re trying to streamline:

  1. Read your sentence slowly

  2. Highlight the most meaningful words

  3. Rewrite the sentence by focusing only on those words

Here’s an example from Henneke herself…

Henneke makes it look easy. 

But can her process pass the ultimate test:

Making my uni dissertation readable? 

I picked out some ripe ol’ stinkers to put this process through its paces.

āš ļø Trigger warning: I’m about to read the whitest sentence ever written…

For context: my English Literature dissertation was on the representation of consumerism in hip hop.

Let’s make it sound like a human wrote it!

Disaster #1:

"Perhaps, alongside the socially universal search for fulfilment through the purchase of consumer goods, young African-American b-boys and b-girls invested so much of their identity in their material possessions due to, as Lury notes, the black community's desire to project their identity into the "public sphere" through participation in consumer culture."

Meaningful words in bold:

Perhaps, alongside the socially universal search for fulfilment through the purchase of consumer goods, young African-American b-boys and b-girls invested so much of their identity in their material possessions due to, as Lury notes, the black community's desire to project their identity into the "public sphere" through participation in consumer culture.

Clear and concise version:

Young b-boys and b-girls invested their identity in material possessions because, as Lury notes, the Black community used consumer culture to project their identity into the public sphere.

[51 words → 28 words]

More human:

B-boys and b-girls used designer clothes to make themselves visible in a culture that ignored them.

Disaster #2:

"Exceptionally large 'chunk' gold and diamond jewellery (usually fake) mocks, yet affirms, the gold fetish in Western trade; fake Gucci and other designer emblems cut up and patch-stitched to jackets, pants, hats, wallets, and sneakers in custom shops, work as a form of satirical warfare."

Meaningful words in bold:

Exceptionally large 'chunk' gold and diamond jewellery (usually fake) mocks, yet affirms, the gold fetish in Western trade; fake Gucci and other designer emblems cut up and patch-stitched to jackets, pants, hats, wallets, and sneakers in custom shops, work as a form of satirical warfare.

Clear and concise version:

Fake gold jewellery mocked yet affirmed Western materialism. Bootleg designer logos patched onto clothes worked as satirical warfare.

[45 words → 19 words]

More human:

Fake gold jewellery and bootleg clothing mocked designer culture while participating in it – a form of satirical warfare through fashion.

Disaster #3:

"The line between irony and sincerity was much more clear-cut in the early days of hip hop, as none of the participants had the economic capacity to afford to wear the re-appropriated items with earnestness - fake designer brands and counterfeit jewellery would be worn merely as a form of aspiration, if not irony."

Meaningful words in bold:

The line between irony and sincerity was much more clear-cut in the early days of hip hop, as none of the participants had the economic capacity to afford to wear the re-appropriated items with earnestness - fake designer brands and counterfeit jewellery would be worn merely as a form of aspiration, if not irony.

Clear and concise version:

The line between irony and sincerity was clearer in early hip hop. Participants couldn't afford real designer brands, so wearing fakes was aspirational and ironic at once.

[53 words → 27 words]

More human:

In early hip hop, fake designer gear was both tribute and middle finger to brands they couldn't afford.

Muuuuuch better, right?

Turns out I could've written my entire dissertation in about half the pages if I'd known this trick back then.

But hey – better late than never!

Now I want to hear from you:

What's YOUR go-to move when a sentence just won't cooperate?

Hit reply if you have one – I'm always on the lookout for editing tricks :)

p.s. wanna dive deeper into Henneke’s method? Check out the article I pulled this process from: How to Sculpt Your Sentences (and Write Clearly)

TOFU Community Manager

Become the go-to AI expert in 30 days

AI keeps coming up at work, but you still don't get it?

That's exactly why 1M+ professionals working at Google, Meta, and OpenAI read Superhuman AI daily.

Here's what you get:

  • Daily AI news that matters for your career - Filtered from 1000s of sources so you know what affects your industry.

  • Step-by-step tutorials you can use immediately - Real prompts and workflows that solve actual business problems.

  • New AI tools tested and reviewed - We try everything to deliver tools that drive real results.

  • All in just 3 minutes a day